First
of all, I want you to read this article. Scroll down a bit until you find the “King was a serial adulterer” subtitle.
And this article. (Yes,
People Magazine, that gossip magazine) (Yes, it existed in 1989.)
Remember
when we talked in class about how nobody talked about MLK’s private life? Nothing about extramarital relationships? Well, someone did, and he did not get a good response from the audience.
Ralph
D. Abernathy and Martin Luther King Jr. were both leaders of the Civil Rights
Movement, they even went to jail together. So, why would he talk about King’s
unfaithfulness on his memoirs book?
Rumor
has it Abernathy was mad and jealous because he did not get the recognition,
respect or publicity King did. So in his memoirs, a couple of pages caught
everyone’s eyes. He wrote about King’s last night alive, and how he spent it
with two women in a hotel room (If you know what I mean) and a third woman whom
he "knocked across the bed... and
for a moment they were in a full-blown fight, with Martin clearly
winning." Funny how the first article does not mention this last
part? Or funny how a gossip magazine does?
My point here is not that King was an
adulterer, that he cheated on his wife in multiple times, or that his
right-hand was jealous and wanted some kind of “revenge”. My point is how the
story is told in this two sources. We know magazines like People are looking
for that little bad thing someone did to expose them and create a big scandal
and have the exclusive. But it seems to me that International Business Times is
not that type of magazine or website. They don’t mention the violent event that
may or may not have happened. I even came across the thought that they may be
protecting King’s public image, or his legacy.
What do you think about this event?
Or about how both websites cover it? Why would he bring this up after King's death? Let me know!
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario